Enter your feature requests for Aprimo DAM, or vote for your preferred feature requests below.

+1

Adobe Creative Cloud Connector - New Asset Creation and Required Fields

Doug Mullin 3 months ago in Aprimo DAM • updated 3 months ago 0

Screen Shot 2018-07-12 at 8.46.01 AM.png
Screen Shot 2018-07-12 at 8.45.44 AM.png
Screen Shot 2018-07-12 at 8.45.28 AM.png
When creating a new Asset via Adobe CC Connector, if the Classification the asset is being saved into has any required fields, the User is confronted with an error message, and no way to enter in the required data. 


Considering how frequent required fields are for our Clients, this is quite inconvenient. It seems like the CC Connector should be uploading to the Uploads holding area, just like an upload via the usual DAM UI. Alternately, instead of the error message, the user could get a dialog box giving them an opportunity to fill in the required metadata. 

Creative Cloud fields
+1
Planned

extend rule condition to compare a date with a calculation

peter.kloren 4 months ago in Aprimo DAM • updated by petra.tant 4 months ago 2

we need to be able to compare a DateField like: LicenseEndDate < (Now + 14) to be able to send out an email 14 days before the asset is expiring. the current implementation only allows to compare with the current date. 

rules configurability
+1
Requested

field definition notes

Doug Mullin 4 months ago in Aprimo DAM • updated by Mary Mcmahon 3 months ago 2

It would be helpful to have a notes field in Field Definitions, where a Admin or Developer can describe the purpose of the field, or any other useful notes for future reference. Would be useful for Clients with large numbers of fields. Also useful for KT after staff turnover, and as a reminder for fields that may have been created long ago, for purposes now forgotten.

assistance UX fields
+1
Requested

Set classification permission on a group of user groups

jim.cavedo 7 months ago in Aprimo DAM • updated by petra.tant 7 months ago 1

When creating a new classification, in order to set user group permissions you have to do it one group at a time. It would be extremely helpful to be able to select multiple groups simultaneously and set the same permissions on all those groups at once. At the user groups grow, setting permissions on a new classification becomes laborious.

security UX classifications
+1
Requested

Ability to reassign an upload as a non-upload administrator

Joris Wynendaele 11 months ago in Aprimo DAM • updated by petra.tant 10 months ago 1

As a non-upload administrator i would like to be able to re-assign an upload in draft to another user. Right now only administrators are able to do this. In the scenario I'm thinking about the "My Uploads" page would accommodate a simple workflow where user A uploads a file, then reassigns it to user B and user B then makes the file available to the DAM.

upload workflow
+1
Requested

Multi-file records in the My uploads UI (higher priority)

Ardath 11 months ago in Aprimo DAM • updated by petra.tant 10 months ago 1

"Toyota will be using multi-file records for a number of its assets;  However, the ‘my uploads’-UI currently does not have any way of adding an uploaded file to an existing record; And as ‘my uploads’ is going to be the only way for Toyota to use the Aspera upload, I think we’ll need it there.

upload meta-data ingestion
0
Requested

Remove empty mandatory record fields when no longer required from a classification

peter.kloren 2 months ago in Aprimo DAM • updated by petra.tant 1 month ago 1

See case CS0015737 

When record fields are attached to a record with scope RecordClassificationDependend, and the classification causing the attachment of the fields is no longer linked to the record, all empty fields should vanish from the record.

Currently, mandatory fields remain linked to the record, though there is no value set, or the value is set empty with a set-to-default trigger.

fields classifications UX
0
Planned

Extend the eval reference to calculate with dates

peter.kloren 4 months ago in Aprimo DAM • updated by petra.tant 4 months ago 2

We need to be able to calculate a default field value for a datefield based on a certain other date, for example today + 100 days, or a value from another datefield minus 30 days.

The current implementation of eval seems only to work for numeric values.

rules customization configurability
0
Requested

Extend compare reference to support greater than and smaller than

peter.kloren 4 months ago in Aprimo DAM • updated by petra.tant 4 months ago 2

Add compare function to compare NumericField, DateField, DateTimeField, DurationField, TextField with

  • a < b
  • a <= b
  • a > b
  • a >= b
customization rules configurability
0
Requested

manage classifications: Remember Browse option

Doug Mullin 4 months ago in Aprimo DAM • updated by petra.tant 4 months ago 1

Got multiple Client requests for the Browse ClassificationsScreen Shot 2018-06-19 at 8.05.04 AM.png option to be remembered for the Manage Classifications window. Currently default is Search Classifications.

UX classifications